Things like this make me shake my head and realize why we are losing the War on Terror. Our "leaders" might as well come out and just admit that they have the articulation skills of a small child and be done with it. If they are so unable to express what they are fighting for and defend it, that they cower before the pen of Le Monde, what hope do we have of winning anything against a people who believe that they have a divine mandate to murder our people?
Yes, yes, I know that this is a non-lethal weapon, but it's the principle of the thing. Our "leaders" are weak and worthless. What matters is that they would rather risk the health of law-abiding or minimally criminal Americans, rather than have to defend their actions to the world when they use it against Islamist fighters and their sympathizers.
Why are we losing the war on terrorism?
We need BIGGER guns, possibly?
*smiling*
You remind me a lot of Vala from Stargate SG1. Especially this scene:
VALA: So I have to assume that the reason why you would want to build more ships is… like other men you like big machines with big engines… that fire big missiles… because you have a deep-seated need to overcompensate for your own shortcomings. *shrugs*
You're RIGHT!
I indeed do not have a pecker and as a woman without one... I feel short changed.
Or not :)
Like the quote, kiddo ;)
Haha, ah, it must be so fun to live and work in the Potomac Playpin. Thanks for dropping in at mine, again!