Such bluntness from this judge is refreshing. It's not every day that you see a public figure like that separate the believer from the beliefs like this:
The man told the court the sex was not about fulfilling his desires but about teaching his daughters how to behave for their husbands when they eventually married, as dictated in scripture.
In sentencing, Judge David Lovell said the misrepresentation of scripture used to justify the abuse of the girls "defied belief", and that he had "hypocritically betrayed" his religion and principles.
Apparently the guy plead guilty, and will probably be out in a few years because he is remorseful and all that. His wife and church also support him, which is good, but I hope there is a very clear understanding there that the man should never be allowed to preach again. It's bad enough that he committed adultery while he was a preacher--it's even worse that not only were the "partners" underage, but his own daughters! A man who has that sort of moral record has no business remaining in any leadership role, no matter how much he repents, and should probably never be allowed to resume one for the rest of his life. If that sounds harsh, consider 1 Timothy 3:
1Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer,[a] he desires a noble task. 2Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect. 5(If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?) 6He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. 7He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil's trap.
8Deacons, likewise, are to be men worthy of respect, sincere, not indulging in much wine, and not pursuing dishonest gain. 9They must keep hold of the deep truths of the faith with a clear conscience. 10They must first be tested; and then if there is nothing against them, let them serve as deacons.
11In the same way, their wives[b] are to be women worthy of respect, not malicious talkers but temperate and trustworthy in everything.
12A deacon must be the husband of but one wife and must manage his children and his household well. 13Those who have served well gain an excellent standing and great assurance in their faith in Christ Jesus.
There's no way he could have honestly believed the Lord wanted him to have sex with his daughters so that they would know "how to behave for their husbands". The man is warped, a pervert, and I can only imagine what that "supportive wife and congregation" must be like...
Perhaps that is the "Lot" defense?
Mike,
Your HTML tags aren't working very well since the upgrade.
Post that worked: "Why we suck at killing them
Posts that haven't: I never understood; Making sexual fraud; Fucking Hypocrites.
I am seeing the tags in both Firefox and IE. The odd thing is that I retyped them myself and came up with the exact same tags/format so I know you are entering the correctly.
Okay, the HTML is mostly up, now it is just the blockquotes and italics tags
Alright, I think I got all of it. Please post any other mistakes like that you see!