**UPDATE**: What a lying little bitch! Seems today that there is a sort of modern woman who has no problem about lying about anything serious from rape to racial violence. Part of me now almost wishes that someone had beaten her up over this, since this is how it went down.
It was an assignment for history class--to make a protest sign for or against an issue, and Melanie said she chose illegal immigration. Her sign read, "If you love our nation, stop illegal immigration." Somehow, Melanie said the sign got passed around lunch and angered a group of Latino students.Yes, these boys and the many other immigrant hispanics like them, are going to integrate just fine into a culture that holds freedom of speech as a cultural value. I suppose we could just expand the concept of freedom of speech a little more by adding violent gang beatings of girls for expressing an opinion in class they didn't like as a form of artistic expression, but the natural result of that is that every serial killer would pose as an artiste protected by the first amendment.
"I didn't know any of these people," she said. One young, she claimed, jumped on her back and he put her in a choke hold. "We have brick walls in the middle school and he slammed my face on the bricks."
Melanie said a group of boys also threatened to rape and kill her. Eventually, the boys let her go and when she went for help, she was ordered back to class, and told she could not call her parents, she said.
I've had women of all races complain to me about how they've been treated by immigrant hispanic men here in Northern Virginia. White, asian, black, hispanics (light-skinned puerto ricans), all the same. If this isn't a cultural issue, why is it that these women of such diverse backgrounds, including other native-born hispanic women, are wary of going where immigrant hispanic men congregate around here? Nah, it couldn't possibly be because this sort of behavior, and lesser forms of it, are far more common among the immigrant groups than yuppie scum white liberals and libertarians want to admit.
This one's easy. It's all a part of the soft racism of low expectations. The establishment doesn't expect non-whites and other minorities--women included--to be able to control themselves or rein in their passions. The establishment basically winks at bad behavior such as this, blaming their behavior on the "racist system" or some such.
But you know, those who grouse about how racist America is are quite correct. If--as evident through your actions (or lack of them)--you think that all non-whites are basically out-of-control animals and can't be expected to behave themselves, therefore failing to hold them accountable because they aren't capable of being held accountable. How racist is that?
BTW, we don't hold freedom of speech as a cultural value any more. The cultural Marxists--led by the Feminists--have taken care of that.
And I do find it interesting that Latinos seem to take it personally when someone objects to illegal aliens flooding this country. Why?
It's probably a function of the fact that a significant percentage of the Hispanics living in the United States are illegal or have some connection to the illegals. Hits close to home, I guess, but then at some point they'll have to decide where their loyalties really lay.
I have seen this first hand. I attend Michigan State University and we invited Chris Simcox of the Minutemen to come speak about illegal immigration. The socialist latino groups shouted him down and insulted him the whole time. Campus police arrested many of them. Afterwards the latino groups filed discrimination against the groups that invited him to speak. Unfortunately the university catered to them and conducted an investigation on no specific evidence.
They eventually dropped it when the professors advising the groups (one who is a minority) spoke up and decided to expose this bias and take an offensive approach and that is why we showed that film 'Indoctrinate U'. If anyone is interested in seeing the craziness just search for MSU and Chris Simcox on youtube.
In addition, my father in law is from Cuba and left when Castro came into power. He learned English, American history and considers himself an American. Unlike most of these immigrants who come and fly their native flags and promote Spanish.
In my limited experience with campus political correctness, I've found that the only way to win is to have the facts, an ability to argue on the fly and a nearly Nietzschean level of confidence (or is that arrogance). I was amazed at how quickly such a professor backed down when it came to a public clash of wills between the two of us. He quickly backed down when I called him out onto the mat in no uncertain terms, not mincing any words. I think that's why unlike the token conservatives, the token libertarian (me) actually scared the leftists in the class.
I have half Hispanic blood relatives in my family and I am related by marriage to a (now deceased) colonel from South Vietnam (his son being my favorite uncle on both sides of the family). Same story as your father-in-law. Came here, abandoned their old ways, and were proud as first time parents are of their children, to be American citizens.
I think sometimes stories like this are set out as a trap. It seems when there's a report of reverse racism, or the majority being the targets of violence, it's often turns out at the end to be false.
They'll report the details the same as other "hate crimes", get those who protest against the biased policies all riled up about what they think is the media finally reporting the other side of the problem.
It's like it's bait to see who out there hasn't learned to overlook these sort hicups in our melting pot of diversity. Those who take the bait get made to look foolish.
I also didn't notice the article say anything about the accusations reflecting an actual problem that the student was just trying to make the public aware of. Which is often added when the media ends up backing a minority who turns out to have made false alligations.
On a side note: "Deep down we're all the same" and "Support diversity", don't these statements contradict each other? If were the same, we're not diverse, and if we're diverse then we're not the same.