By now most of you have probably heard about the AP's use of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act against the Drudge Retort. While I think that their use of about twelve percent of the AP's stories was probably fair use in the strictest legal sense of the term, I am actually a bit sympathetic to the Associated Press. Not for the reasons shown in this case, but rather because there are still bloggers who have a habit of reproducing most, if not all, of a mainstream media story on their blogs without adding much of anything to it.
My sympathy is largely [clarification: all but entirely] abstract. I can't count the number of times I've clicked on a link from Instapundit to another blog and all I found was a few pithy comments below a large chunk of excerpted text. It's a writer of rare talent who can pull that sort of thing off in a way that adds any value, and the closest thing I've seen with that is when Vox Day takes a potshot or two that is just amusing at a story.
**UPDATE**: And this would be why I so strongly qualify my sympathy for the mainstream media as something more abstract than real. While the AP plays the saddest song on the littlest violin in the whole wide world, it gets caught doing not only the very thing it is upset about, but does it even worse than those it targeted!
My sympathy is largely [clarification: all but entirely] abstract. I can't count the number of times I've clicked on a link from Instapundit to another blog and all I found was a few pithy comments below a large chunk of excerpted text. It's a writer of rare talent who can pull that sort of thing off in a way that adds any value, and the closest thing I've seen with that is when Vox Day takes a potshot or two that is just amusing at a story.
**UPDATE**: And this would be why I so strongly qualify my sympathy for the mainstream media as something more abstract than real. While the AP plays the saddest song on the littlest violin in the whole wide world, it gets caught doing not only the very thing it is upset about, but does it even worse than those it targeted!
Related Entries:
- Could the FCC's reprimand of Comcast pave the way for an Internet Fairness Doctrine?
- Random thoughts and links
- Best quote about social networking--ever
- Some thoughts on OpenID
- A commenter's bill of rights
- Since when did they become a country?
- Another MT theme project
- The Lori Drew case and the future of cyber bullying
- Mashing it up with Google Reader
- My latest Movable Type style project


Hadn't heard of the AP-Drudge Retort fight, but then again I live in my own bubble.
I don't understand why those folks that quote nearly an entire article but only add a small amount of content are blogging the first place. Makes me wonder why">why">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/ten-reasons-i-dont-read-your-blog>why anyone would read their blog in the first place.
I try to emulate Vox's style mightily, but fail regularly. And pithy? I don't think I do well on that count either.
Let's try that link again
I used to be able to emulate it fairly well sometimes, but I gave up because I realized how much of an asshole I sounded like most of the time. It's a little known fact that my blog has been around since 2003, earlier still if you count my first efforts via Blogger (around 2001). If I merged my old content with the new, I'd have about 4,000 blog posts, most of which I would now no longer want up here.
I am all for internet freedom fighters. May they bankrupt AP! Lalalalalalala
There have been times I quoted the entire article, but that is due to not wanting the information to disappear into the ether. But I always provide SO much insightful commentary that no one would EVER confuse me with those dirty bloggers
Uh huh.... keep telling yourself that, Erik... j/k